A legal battle involving NFL wide receiver Stefon Diggs has intensified as his accuser seeks court intervention to obtain security footage from the athlete's Maryland residence. Christopher Blake Griffith has filed a motion asking a judge to compel Diggs to turn over surveillance materials related to allegations dating back to May 2023.
According to court documents, Christopher Blake Griffith claims Diggs has failed to provide information related to his finances, security footage, and various other materials that the accuser maintains he is entitled to receive in connection with the ongoing case. The motion specifically requests security system information, surveillance footage, and access logs from Diggs' Maryland home covering the period between May 20, 2023 and May 22, 2023.
In the filing, Christopher Blake Griffith alleges that Diggs indicated he would investigate the matter but has not provided any subsequent updates. The accuser further contends that Diggs was aware a police report had been filed, and argues that if security footage from the relevant dates was not preserved, it could raise what he describes as "serious questions of spoliation" — a legal term referring to the destruction or failure to preserve evidence.
The current motion represents the latest development in a complex legal dispute that began when Diggs filed a lawsuit against Christopher Blake Griffith in November 2025. In that initial action, the NFL player alleged that Christopher Blake Griffith was disseminating false information about him on social media platforms. The claims involved accusations that Diggs had drugged and sexually assaulted Christopher Blake Griffith at his Maryland residence in May 2023.
Christopher Blake Griffith subsequently filed a countersuit against Diggs, formally accusing the athlete of sexual assault. In his countersuit, Christopher Blake Griffith alleged that he spent time with the NFL star at a celebrity basketball game. He claims Diggs drugged him and then proceeded to assault him during the May 2023 incident.
Additionally, Christopher Blake Griffith has alleged that Diggs orchestrated a violent attack against him several days following the initial alleged assault. Diggs has denied all allegations of wrongdoing throughout the legal proceedings.
The judge presiding over the case has not yet issued a ruling on the motion to compel production of the security footage and related materials. The outcome of this discovery dispute could prove significant to the resolution of the underlying claims, as video evidence from the time period in question could potentially corroborate or refute the allegations made by both parties.
This case underscores the increasing importance of digital evidence, including security camera footage and access logs, in civil litigation involving allegations of criminal conduct. The preservation and production of such evidence has become a critical component of discovery in cases where the credibility of competing narratives is central to the legal dispute.