Cardi B has returned to court with allegations that blogger Tasha K has violated the terms of a bankruptcy settlement agreement by continuing to publicly discuss the rapper's ex-husband, Offset. According to court documents filed Monday, May 4, 2026, the "Bodak Yellow" artist claims the blogger has breached a non-disparagement clause that explicitly prohibits her from making public statements about Cardi B or her associates.
The legal dispute stems from a previous defamation case in which Cardi B, represented by attorney Lisa Moore, was awarded four million dollars from Tasha K. Following that judgment, Tasha K filed for bankruptcy and subsequently negotiated a settlement that reduced her debt to $1.2 million with structured monthly payments. As part of that bankruptcy plan, she agreed to a non-disparagement clause barring her from publicly discussing Cardi B or individuals associated with her, including Offset and Stefon Diggs.
In the newly filed court documents, Cardi B alleges that Tasha K has continued to violate this agreement by making public comments about Offset. The rapper specifically points to statements regarding alleged gambling activities and references to a recent shooting incident that resulted in Offset's hospitalization. These alleged violations represent a direct breach of the terms both parties agreed to as part of the bankruptcy settlement.
The case illustrates the ongoing challenges celebrities face in enforcing legal agreements designed to protect their reputations and privacy. Non-disparagement clauses have become increasingly common in settlement agreements, particularly in cases involving public figures and media personalities. Such provisions serve as contractual safeguards against continued harmful speech, even after initial legal disputes have been resolved.
Cardi B is now seeking judicial intervention to address what she characterizes as repeated violations of the agreement. Her legal team has requested that the court find Tasha K in violation of the non-disparagement clause and impose significant sanctions. These requested penalties include requiring Tasha K to cover Cardi B's attorney's fees incurred in bringing this enforcement action.
The outcome of this legal action could have broader implications for how bankruptcy settlements involving public figures are enforced. If the court finds in favor of Cardi B, it would reinforce the binding nature of non-disparagement agreements and potentially deter similar violations in future cases. The court has not yet issued a ruling on the matter, and it remains unclear when a decision might be rendered.